- DISKKEEPER VS SAMSUNG TRIM PRO
- DISKKEEPER VS SAMSUNG TRIM SOFTWARE
- DISKKEEPER VS SAMSUNG TRIM WINDOWS
I guess, I based my calculation on 50GB per day = 140 days to reach 70TB. I was very unsure about the SSD lifespan. I hoped the app would make things smoother. I had it installed because I used to have my OS and everything else on a 1Tb drive.
DISKKEEPER VS SAMSUNG TRIM WINDOWS
I already manually defrag through Windows weekly anyway. It helped me a lot!Īfter some consideration based off the answer on here, I am getting rid of Diskeeper.
DISKKEEPER VS SAMSUNG TRIM PRO
If you want a long-lasting SSD I would look for a used Samsung Pro that has MLC flash, like the 860 Pro, in the largest size you can afford. For example a 256GB Samsung 860 Pro uses MLC flash, the most reliable and long-lasting kind of flash, and was warrantied out to 300TBW. Also the "older" flash technologies had much greater endurance.
If you are paranoid about TBW, buy the next size up as TBW ratings normally double every time you double drive size, since the wear is spread out more over the flash. Obviously keep backups no matter what drive you are using.Īnother issue is your SSD size as that is impacting your TBW rating. I am all for competition so I hate to dissuade the smaller brands, but sadly my experience with them has not been good and I pretty much just stick to the bigger brands now. There is no data recovery possible like on an HDD. I have had some issues with Intel SSDs, and when you get into the smaller brands / generic brands there are semi-frequent failures. I have literally never seen a failed SSD from Samsung or Crucial, and very rarely from SanDisk. Sadly once you venture outside of the "big 3" in the SSD world (Samsung, Crucial, and SanDisk/aka WD) the reliability becomes questionable. The bigger concern I would have is the brand. By the time you have worn out a 128GB SSD, it will probably cost less than $30 to replace it. Look at what SSD prices have done in the last five years and project that 5 years into the future. And these are our heaviest users, many people write way less than this. At this rate the expected SSD lifespan for a 70TBW drive is over five years. Even with no special precautions whatsoever (such as redirecting the cache folders as you have done), our highest wear users write about 30 GB/day. On an SSD you definitely shouldn't be running it as defragging just wears out the SSD with no real benefit.Īlso you may be excessively paranoid about SSD wear. So in my opinion Perfect Disk is way better.Diskeeper has always been a dubious scam product IMO, even when running on an HDD. Perfect Disk is slow when it comes to defrag but it commits itself to each and every file and folder. One can see the very evident change after de-fragmentation.
I was able to run it on Windows 7, reclaim a lot of lost space 4- The Defragmentation techniques of Perfect Disk are far more better when it comes to File Placement for faster access. 3- User Interface and readibility in Perfect Disk 10 has significantly improved. 2- Economically speaking Perfect Disk is cheaper and better at play. Perfect Disk not only removed the fragmentation for those files but the most evident proof is that when I ran Diskeeper I was able to see none of those fragments again. This was achieved easily with Perfect Disk. 1- Diskeeper being faster at defragging was unable to remove fragmented boot files and low performing system files.
DISKKEEPER VS SAMSUNG TRIM SOFTWARE
If I were given a choice I would take some base points and evaluate both the software exhaustively which I already have. It dosent matter as to who is a partner or not.
0 kommentar(er)
